🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.