🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic talks with the United States provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in various formats if discussions restart.

Trump recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war revealed the dispute could not be settled by military means. He said the attacks began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had always attempted to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the final answer to resolve disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a answer in the same language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have become stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the wake of this attack."